Legal Opinion

In re Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 6, 1999No. 25028PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance matter, Horace A. Smith (“Attorney”) is charged with engaging in misconduct in violation of various provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct contained in Rule 407, SCACR, and the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

Factual/Procedural Background

On April 1, 1996, the Commission on Lawyer Conduct (the “Commission”) served Attorney with a notice and complaint alleging misconduct during the representation of a client, Ronald Quarles, on a shoplifting charge in municipal court. The charges alleged that during Quarles’s trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Matter of KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Matter of MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Matter of GoldenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. In the Matter of AckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re AtwaterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API