Gottschalk v. C., B. & Q. R. R.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court of Platte county. Heard below before George W. Post, J. cited: Southern P. jE. P. v. Peed, 41 Cal., 256. Loeldand v. P. P. Co., 3 Mo., 180. Brady v. DesMoines & Fort Dodge P. P., 10 N. W. R., 754. G. P. & I. P. P. Co. v. Heizel, 38 Mich., 71. Dillon on Mun. Corp., 3d Ed., § 274. cited: Dillon on Mun. Corp., 576. Milbwrn v. Cedar Rapids, 12 Iowa, 246. Barney v. Keohuh, 94 U. S., 340. Ind.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court of Platte county. Heard below before George W. Post, J. cited: Southern P. jE. P. v. Peed, 41 Cal., 256. Loeldand v. P. P. Co., 3 Mo., 180. Brady v. DesMoines & Fort Dodge P. P., 10 N. W. R., 754. G. P. & I. P. P. Co. v. Heizel, 38 Mich., 71. Dillon on Mun. Corp., 3d Ed., § 274. cited: Dillon on Mun. Corp., 576. Milbwrn v. Cedar Rapids, 12 Iowa, 246. Barney v. Keohuh, 94 U. S., 340. Ind. P. P. Co. v. Hartley, 67 111., 439. A. & N. R. R. v. Gaviede, 10 Kan., 552. Mercer v. P. P. Co., 35 Penn. State, 99. Brooldyn v. Railroad, 47 New York,. 475.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
The plaintiff is the owner of certain lots in block 83 in the city of Columbus, which abut upon the alley running through said block. The defendant, in pursuance of authority from the mayor and council, located and constructed a railroad in said alley, by reason of which the plaintiff claims that the lot in question is damaged or diminished in value in the sum of $475, and this action was brought to recover the same. The cause was referred by consent to a referee, who found as follows:
First. That the plaintiff is the owner of fractional lots 7 and 8, in block 83, in the city of Columbus,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Stetson v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- City of Shawneetown v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- City of Pekin v. WinkelIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R. R. v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Reardon v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Austin v. Augusta Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Pause v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Buhl v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Board of County Commissioners v. AdlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.