Legal Opinion

City of Shawneetown v. Mason

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1876PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Gallatin county; the Hon. Tazewell B. Taftiteb, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Soiiolfield

The material allegations in the first count of the declaration, and which present with sufficient fullness the character of the action, are, that plaintiffs “ are the owners of in-lot Ho. 1139, in the city of Shawneetown, situated and fronting on í'ront street in said city; that it was the duty of the city to keep said street in repair and free from obstructions in front of said lot, so that plaintiffs might have a convenient passage way in and out of said premises; that the city wrongfully and unlawfully erected an embankment of earth of great heighth, to-wit: ten feet, and of great width,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nevins v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. City of Aurora v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. City of Pekin v. BreretonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. City of Pekin v. WinkelIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Stone v. Fairbury, Pontiac & Northwestern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Chicago City Railway Co. v. BundyIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. City of Elgin v. EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railway Co. v. StickneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Welsh v. Village of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API