Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R. R. v. Hall

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1878PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walked

Appellee, as the' owner of a lot of ground in the city of Chicago, and which he occupied as a residence, sued the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. P,aul, the Pittsburgh and St. Louis, and the Chicago, Danville and Vincennes Eailway Companies for damages claimed to have been done by laying their tracks near his dwelling; that they placed on the same block a round house and a coal yard; also laid their tracks across streets near his residence and left cars standing on the same, thereby impeding access to and egress from his property. He amended his declaration, averring further damages by reason of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago & Pacific Railroad v. FrancisIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Austin v. Augusta Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Eshelman v. RawaltIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Spencer v. Point Pleasant & Ohio R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railway Co. v. StickneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API