Legal Opinion
Harmon v. Honeywell Intelligrated
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 9, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00670Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION MALISSA R. HARMON, Case No. 1:19-cv-670 Plaintiff, Cole, J. Litkovitz, M.J. vs. HONEYWELL INTELLIGRATED, ORDER Defendant. Plaintiff Malissa Harmon brings this employment discrimination action against defendant Honeywell Intelligrated (“Honeywell”). This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to strike (Doc. 51), plaintiff’s response in opposition (Doc. 54), and defendant’s reply memorandum (Doc. 56). I. Background On June 30, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a third amended complaint “to transfer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- HDC, LLC v. City of Ann ArborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Gillibeau v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Watkins & Son Pet Supplies v. The Iams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Michael Rhinehimer v. U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Watkins & Son Pet Supplies v. Iams Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.