Legal Opinion

Gillibeau v. City of Richmond

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 13, 1969No. 23062PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

John and Doris Gillibeau, on behalf of themselves and “all other negroes similarly situated,” brought this civil rights action for damages, a declaratory judgment, and declaratory relief against seven named individuals and “Does One through Eighty.” The named defendants still in the case are Charles E. Brown, a Richmond, California city policeman, Elmer Evans, Ervin R. Martin and William H. Zeiler, officers of the Municipal Court of Richmond, James P. Kenny, a member of the Richmond Board of Supervisors,1 and Walter Laughlin and Donald Workman, the owners of certain…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Dombrowski v. EastlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by150 opinions

  1. Salahuddin v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Salahuddin v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. Simmons v. AbruzzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,947 Dean Walling v. Beverly Enterprises, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Hearns v. San Bernardino Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API