Legal Opinion

Watkins & Son Pet Supplies v. Iams Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 3, 1999No. C-3-95-189PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR TO STRIKE ALL OR A PORTION OF COUNTS I, III, IV, V AND VI OF PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. # 90)

RICE, Chief Judge.

This litigation arises out of the termination of a long-term business relationship. Plaintiff Watkins and Son Pet Supplies (‘Watkins”) has been a distributor of dog and cat food and pet products for more than thirty years. 1 Since the late 1970’s, Plaintiff has contracted with Defendant lams Company (“lams”) to be a distributor of lams’ dog and cat products. Beginning in…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Findlay v. Hotels.Com, L.P.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  2. Suture Express, Inc. v. Cardinal Health 200, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
  3. Wausau Benefits v. Progressive InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
  4. In Re Bextra & Celebrex Marketing Sales Practices & Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
  5. CTI SERVICES LLC v. HaremzaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API