Watkins & Son Pet Supplies v. Iams Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR TO STRIKE ALL OR A PORTION OF COUNTS I, III, IV, V AND VI OF PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. # 90)
RICE, Chief Judge.
This litigation arises out of the termination of a long-term business relationship. Plaintiff Watkins and Son Pet Supplies (‘Watkins”) has been a distributor of dog and cat food and pet products for more than thirty years. 1 Since the late 1970’s, Plaintiff has contracted with Defendant lams Company (“lams”) to be a distributor of lams’ dog and cat products. Beginning in…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Findlay v. Hotels.Com, L.P.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- Suture Express, Inc. v. Cardinal Health 200, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Wausau Benefits v. Progressive InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- In Re Bextra & Celebrex Marketing Sales Practices & Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- CTI SERVICES LLC v. HaremzaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.