Dormont Realty, Inc. v. Cyrus
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that the lower court erred in holding that it did not have jurisdiction to consider her petition to open and/or strike a judgment entered in the court of common pleas on the transcript of a justice of the peace. Because the lower court failed to consider the question of when appellant received notice of the entry of the justice of peace judgment, we remand for an evidentiary hearing on that issue.
The facts giving rise to the instant appeal are as follows: On October 7, 1976, appellee filed a landlord and tenant complaint against appellant in which it…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- DePAUL v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Cameron v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Lacock v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
- Taylor v. Tudor & FreeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Laska v. ZelazowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mead v. HolterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979