Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Tudor & Free

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

It has been the law in this State for many years that a judgment entered upon a transcript from a justice of the peace cannot be set aside, if regular upon its face, or opened and defendant let into a defense, in the court of common pleas: Lacock v. White, 19 Pa. 495; Boyd v. Miller, 52 Pa. 431; Clark v. M’Comman, 7 W. & S. 469; nor can the transcript be amended in the common pleas: Doerr v. Graybill, 24 Pa. Superior Ct. 321. Any attack upon the validity of such judgment must be made before the justice. The same rule prevails as to judgments of the common pleas certified…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lacock v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
  2. Holly v. TravisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Clark v. M'CommanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  4. Diamond v. TobiasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
  5. Doerr v. GraybillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Battles v. NesbitSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Taylor v. TudorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Director General of Railroads v. Birdsboro Stone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Madsen v. HigginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Beachel v. Hile, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API