Taylor v. Tudor & Free
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
It has been the law in this State for many years that a judgment entered upon a transcript from a justice of the peace cannot be set aside, if regular upon its face, or opened and defendant let into a defense, in the court of common pleas: Lacock v. White, 19 Pa. 495; Boyd v. Miller, 52 Pa. 431; Clark v. M’Comman, 7 W. & S. 469; nor can the transcript be amended in the common pleas: Doerr v. Graybill, 24 Pa. Superior Ct. 321. Any attack upon the validity of such judgment must be made before the justice. The same rule prevails as to judgments of the common pleas certified…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lacock v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
- Holly v. TravisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Clark v. M'CommanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
- Diamond v. TobiasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
- Doerr v. GraybillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Battles v. NesbitSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Taylor v. TudorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Director General of Railroads v. Birdsboro Stone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Madsen v. HigginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Beachel v. Hile, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.