Legal Opinion
Geiger v. Tower Automotive
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 4, 2009No. 08-1314PublishedCited by 344 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
Raymond Geiger appeals the grant of summary judgment to Tower Automotive (“Tower”) on his employment discrimination claims pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623(a) and Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (“ELCRA”), Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 37.2202 et seq. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan found that Geiger failed to make a pñma facie showing of age discrimination under either federal or state law and entered judgment as a matter of law for Tower.
*618For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by344 opinions
- Smith v. City of AllentownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Peggy Blizzard v. Marion Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Provenzano v. LCI Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Sheila Hensley v. Ronald GassmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Karon Jackson v. VHS Detroit Receiving HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
339 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.