Legal Opinion
China Diesel Imports, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 2, 1994No. Court No. 92-10-00696. Slip Op. 94-90PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
Plaintiff China Diesel Imports, Inc. (“CDI”) challenges the decision of the United States Customs Service excluding certain JINMA model 1100 diesel engines from entry on the ground that the engines are the product of prohibited labor as defined in § 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930. See 19 U.S.C. § 1307 (1988). Both CDI and Customs move for summary judgment on the issue of whether Customs correctly determined that the class of diesel engines in question was the product of forced or convict labor and therefore properly prohibited entry into the United States.
BACKGROUND
Plainti…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Florsheim Shoe Company, Div. Of Interco, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Itt Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Bell v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2010
- China Diesel Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- International Labor Rights Fund v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Chrysler Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Southern Cross Seafoods, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.