Legal Opinion

Keystone Land & Development Co. v. Xerox Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2004No. 74904-3PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

Keystone Land & Development Company (Keystone) claims Xerox Corporation (Xerox) breached two separate contracts: one to sell its Tukwila facility to Keystone and one to negotiate in good faith a purchase and sale agreement for the facility. The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington granted Xerox’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed Keystone’s claims under both contracts. Keystone appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed summary judgment dismissal of Keystone’s claims under the substantive contract but seeks this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. Tribune Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  3. Arcadian Phosphates, Inc., Judas Azuelos, and Eli Sivan v. Arcadian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. Butler v. BaloliaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. P.E. Systems, LLC v. CPI Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Hoglund v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corp. v. Firstgroup America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API