Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Fulbright

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1964No. 601PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

In this Court, on oral argument, defendants, through their counsel, abandoned all their assignments of error except those which present two questions, viz.: 1. Are defendants entitled to judgment of nonsuit? 2. If not, does the evidence disclose as a matter of law that Thompson was contributorily negligent as alleged in the answer?

The substantive rights and liabilities of the parties are to be determined in accordance with the law of Virginia, the lex loci.. Procedural matters are to be determined in accordance with the law of North Carolina, the lex fori. Nix v. English, 254 N.C. 414, 419,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lovette v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Barnes v. AshworthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  3. Scott v. SimmsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  4. Jefferson Hospital, Inc. v. Van LearSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  5. Essick v. City of LexingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thames v. NELLO L. TEER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Cobb v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Chewning v. ChewningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Coleman v. BurrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Frank v. FunkhouserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API