Legal Opinion

Alvarez v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 14, 2003No. AC 23604PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Jorge Alvarez, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that he failed to prove his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, the petitioner claims that he was denied effective assistance because his trial counsel, Milo J. Altschuler, (1) failed to prepare for certain evidentiary issues, (2) made an inadequate investigation and (3) failed to object to an improper statement made by the prosecutor during closing argument to…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. State v. EcholsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Nieves v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Alterisi v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Toccaline v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Griffin v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. Woods v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Servello v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API