Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 7, 2006No. AC 26456PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The petitioner, James Griffin, following the granting of his petition for certification, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his amended petition for a writ of habeas coipus. The petitioner’s sole claim on appeal is that his trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to locate, interview and call a material witness who would have provided exculpatory evidence at the petitioner’s criminal trial. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following factual and procedural history is pertinent to the resolution of the petitioner’s appeal. In the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Aillon v. MeachumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Toccaline v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Toccaline v. Lantz, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vazquez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Pierce v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Floyd v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. J.R. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Weinberg v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API