Legal Opinion

Tarbell & Whitham v. Gifford

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 17, 1909PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Assumpsit, under P. S. 1534, to enforce the liability of members of an -unincorporated society on a judgment against it. Pleá, tbe general issue. Trial by jury at the December Term, 1907, Windsor County, Powers, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit, under P. S. 1534, to enforce the liability of members of an -unincorporated society on a judgment against it. Pleá, tbe general issue. Trial by jury at the December Term, 1907, Windsor County, Powers, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case. See Benedict v. Union Agricultural Society, 74 Yt. 91. Defendants are bound as members by the purchase and acceptance of the membership ticket. .In Upton v. Tribilcock, 91 U. S. 45-50, the Court by Mr. Justice Hunt says: ‘ ‘ That the defendant did not read the charter and…

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

This is an action under what is now section 1534 of the Public Statutes to enforce an alleged liability of two of the defendants, Albert Waterman and Fayette Rogers, as members of the Union Agricultural Society an unincorporated association. The evidence tended to show that in 1897 the above named society became liable to one Benedict for damages caused by its negligence and that in November or December, 1898, the society employed the plaintiffs as attorneys to defend it in a suit brought by said Benedict.

The evidence further tended to show that on June 20, 1904, the plaintiffs recovered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. King v. WoodbridgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
  2. F. R. Patch Manufacturing Co. v. CapelessSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
  3. Konta v. St. Louis Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. Cook v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
  5. Smith v. HollisterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. TaylorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  2. Daniels v. Elks Club of Hartford and the Human Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  3. Drown v. OderkirkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  4. Johnson v. South Blue Hill Cemetery AssociationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  5. Northeastern Nash Auto. Co., Inc. v. BartlettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API