Legal Opinion

Northeastern Nash Auto. Co., Inc. v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 11, 1927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

The action is tort for the conversion of a Dodge touring ear. Plaintiff had a verdict and judgment below, and the case is here on defendant’s exceptions.

The plaintiff is a corporation organized by John M. Allen for the purpose of selling Nash ears and used ears taken in trade. At the times here material, Allen owned practically all of plaintiff’s capital stock, was its president and treasurer, and had general management of its business. For some months prior to the latter part of September, 1924, plaintiff had in its employ one Jewett Laird, who did such repair work on its ears as was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brooks v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Gray v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Harding v. Town of TownsendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
  4. Higman v. CamodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Brown v. AitkenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. My Sister's Place v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  2. Hall v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  3. Alesko v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bliss v. Moore StoughtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  5. Dieter v. ScottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API