Legal Opinion

Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2007No. CC 9706-04753; CA A117696; SC S53242PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.

Is the Court of Appeals lawfully constituted? Defendant Lincoln Loan Co. argues that it is not, because — in defendant’s view — the provision of the Oregon Constitution that purports to authorize the legislature to establish courts was improperly adopted in 1910. It therefore follows — again, in defendant’s view — that, when the legislature created the Court of Appeals by statute in 1969, it had no authority to do so. For that reason, defendant asserts, the Court of Appeals decision in this case, which reversed a trial court judgment in favor of defendant, is invalid and must be vacated. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FadeleyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. STATE Ex Rel MADDEN v. CRAWFORDOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Nottage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Livingston v. METROPOLITAN PEDIATRICS, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Morgan v. Sisters School District 6Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. James Buckner (074390)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  4. Hatkoff v. Portland Adventist Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. In re SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API