Legal Opinion
San Ore-Gardner v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided June 27, 1980No. LR-73-C-123PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROY, District Judge.
Some background information may be helpful in understanding the issues involved in this cause of action. Under the authority of Public Law 525, 79th Congress, July 24, 1946, 60 Stat. 634, the Government undertook the development of a multiple-purpose project known as the Arkansas River Project to improve the navigability of the Arkansas and White Rivers.
At all times material herein, the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (Missouri Pacific or the Railroad) has been the owner and operator of a railroad bridge across the White River near Benzal, Arkansas,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jefferson Hotel Co. v. BrumbaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
- Gogo v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- United States Ex Rel. Gillioz v. John Kerns Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- General Insurance Co. of America v. Commerce Hyatt HouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Investors Thrift Corporation v. HuntDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hutton Contracting Co. v. City of CoffeyvilleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- s.o.g.-san Ore-Gardner v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Travelers Indemnity Company. s.o.g.-san Ore-Gardner v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- S.O.G.-San Ore-Gardner v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981