Legal Opinion

N.A.M. v. M.P.W.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 7, 2017No. 2255 EDA 2016PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.:

N.A.M. (“Father”) appeals pro se1 from the August 18, 2016 order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County that found M.P.W. (“Mother”) in contempt, but imposed no sanctions.2 After careful review, we affirm to the extent that the trial court held Mother in contempt. To the extent that it refused to impose any sanction, we are constrained to reverse and remand.

This matter, commenced by complaint for custody on May 15, 2006, involves the custody of N.J.M., born in February of 2000, and H.A.M., born in November of 2002 (collectively, the “Children”). In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Equipment Finance, Inc. v. GrannasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Genovese v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Takosky v. HenningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Flannery v. IbertiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Gates v. GatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. E.B. v. D.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. K.M.G. v. H.M.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Chilutti, S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Chilutti, S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Benton, A. v. Adovor, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API