Legal Opinion
Welchlin v. Fairmont Railway Motors
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 23, 1930No. 27,883PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Certiorari on the relation of the employe against the Fairmont Railway Motors, his employer, to review the order of the industrial commission holding that the disability for which he had been receiving compensation upon the basis of temporary total disability had ceased and denying him compensation for partial disability.
On March 6, 1929, the relator was injured while in the employ of the Fairmont Railway Motors. The respondent Anchor Casualty Company is the insurer. The handle on the carriage of a lathe at which he was working hit him on the inside of his right leg in the region of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hunnewell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Rialto Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Sandy v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Bramble v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hood v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Miller v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Fruehauf Corp. v. PraterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Sigley v. Marathon Razor Blade Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Hartman v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.