Legal Opinion

Huntington Easy Payment Co. v. Parsons

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1907PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Cabell'County. Action by the Huntington Easy Payment Company against W. E. Parsons and wife. Erom a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

POEFENBARGER, JUDGE:

For damages, general and special, for breach of a covenant in a lease of business rooms, for the period of five years, the Huntington Easy Payment Company obtained a verdict in the circuit court of Cabell county, against W. E. Parsons and Harriett Parsons, his wife, for the sum of $1200.00. Under the impression that an error had been committed in respect to three items of special damages, namely, $200.00 for goods damaged, $80.00 for removing goods from one place to another in Huntington, and $16.75 for loss of time by employes, due to the greater time required for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hurxthal v. Boom Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. James v. Kibler's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  3. Robrecht v. Marling's Adm'rWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Adair v. BogleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  5. Griffith v. Blackwater Boom & Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Smithson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Thomason v. MosrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. American Transit Lines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Snider v. DebanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Mooney v. Eastern Associated Coal Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API