Legal Opinion

People v. Stone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 30, 1997PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s challenge for cause of a prospective juror who defendant contended was unfit to serve (see, People v Holder, 204 AD2d 482, lv denied 83 NY2d 968). Further, defendant was not prejudiced when the court excused the prospective juror based upon the People’s peremptory challenge (see, CPL 270.20 [2]). Similarly, the court properly exercised its discretion in denying the challenge of defendant for cause of another prospective juror because his responses to the questions of defense counsel did…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. RoopchandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. SatloffNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. VargasNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. WiegertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Stone v. StinsonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2000
  3. People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. HOWARD, HAROLD, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API