Legal Opinion

People v. Wiegert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s challenges for cause of three prospective jurors. The prospective juror who stated that she was influenced by the opinions of her father-in-law, a correction officer, did not exhibit actual bias toward defendant or otherwise indicate that she possessed “a state of mind that [was] likely to preclude [her] from rendering an impartial verdict based upon the evidence adduced at the trial” (CPL 270.20 [1] [b]; see, People v…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. BeattieNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. LeaboNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. ShorterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. HagenbuchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. ShaughnessyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. People v. StillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. People v. PaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API