Legal Opinion

Estate of Clavo

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1907No. Civ. No. 331PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Solano County setting apart a homestead to the widow out of the estate of her deceased husband. L. G. Harrier, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The appeal is from an order setting aside absolutely to Ann Clavo, widow of the deceased, certain property as and for a homestead.

Two declarations of homestead upon the same property appear in the transcript; one executed jointly by Clavo and a former wife in 1877 upon the property as his separate estate, and the other executed by Clavo alone in 1880 after the death of his said former wife and his marriage to Ann Clavo, respondent herein.

Four propositions are submitted by appellant' to which brief consideration will be given.

1. It is clear that we are not concerned about the construction of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Weinreich v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sanders v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Tyrrell v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Dickey v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zanone v. SpragueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Estate of RonayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Vieth v. KlettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Melvin J. Towers v. James A. Curry, Trustee, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. In Re TowersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API