Legal Opinion

Zanone v. Sprague

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1911No. Civ. No. 839PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is a suit to quiet title to certain real property situated in the city of San Francisco.

The court granted defendant’s motion for a nonsuit and rendered and caused to be entered judgment accordingly. The appeal here is by the plaintiff from said judgment.

There is no dispute as to the important facts, which are: Alfred Goad and plaintiff’s intestate, Catherine A. Powers, intermarried in the month of July, 1869.

The real estate in dispute was the separate property of said Alfred Goad, it having been devised to him by his father, Samuel Goad, prior to his said marriage to plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bahn v. StarckeTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Rosholt v. MehusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Brady v. KreugerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Roth v. InsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hutchinson v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lang v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McLaughlin Land & Livestock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. P.I.E. Employees Federal Credit Union v. BassUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. California Bank v. SchlesingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Estate of RonayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API