Legal Opinion

Yehle v. Stamey-Tidd Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 7, 1939No. 34,381PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

This action originated as a proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act. On March 10, 1937, the respondent construction company was engaged in digging a sanitary sewer. The appellant, one of its workmen, was employed in operating its excavator. By some mishap a crane carrying a load of tile was swung over his head; then something broke and he was hit on the head and knocked unconscious, and his collar bone, right shoulder and back were injured.

Without any ado his employer began paying him compensation at the rate of $14.40 per week…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Dobson v. Apex Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Hurst v. Independent Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Keach v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Harkrader v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clemons v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Everett v. Kansas Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  3. Bailey v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Farr v. Mid-Continent Lead & Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. State ex rel. Arn v. Consumers Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API