Clark v. Murray
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
This is an action in quo warranto to determine who is entitled to the office of judge of the city court, division No. 2, of the city of Wichita.
At the general election in 1932 plaintiff was elected to the above office, the duties of which he assumed January 9, 1933. At the general election in 1934, plaintiff was again a candidate, and was opposed by defendant,' who received a majority of the votes cast, was declared elected and a certificate of election was issued to him.
*534Plaintiff’s contention is that by reason of change in population of the…
2Cited by34 opinions
- Martindale v. TennySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Egnatic ex rel. Egnatic v. WollardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Higgins v. Cardinal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Felten Truck Line, Inc. v. State Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.