Farr v. Mid-Continent Lead & Zinc Co.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is a workmen’s compensation case. Judgment was for claimant. Defendant appeals.

*52After the opinion reversing the judgment of the lower court was filed a rehearing was allowed. The appeal was reargued and submitted in December. This court adheres to the order of reversal. On account of the interest in the case among those who are interested in workmen’s compensation, and because there are some other cases the outcome of which depends on the outcome of this case, it will be reconsidered somewhat at length here.

The first question to be…