Legal Opinion

Augustus v. Bean

California Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1961No. L. A. 26306PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

In 1956 Harry C. Augustus was injured as a result of the negligent operation by Aaron Shaffer and Cecil Compton Bean of their respective automobiles, and he recovered judgment against them in April 1958. That judgment was fully satisfied by Shaffer, and one-half of the amount he paid was awarded to him as contribution from Bean, who appeals contending that there was no right of contribution.

Prior to the enactment in 1957 of title 11 of part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (§§ 875-880), the general rule was that one tortfeasor could not obtain contribution from another. (Adams v. White Bus…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. RosenthalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Adams v. White Bus LineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Deuscher v. CammeranoNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. First National Bank v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Smith v. Fall River Joint Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. In Re Marriage of BuolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Lincenberg v. IssenSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  4. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API