Legal Opinion

Chippewa Indians v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 8, 1940No. H-163PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittletoN, Judge

This case was heard and submitted under Rule 39 (a) upon the question of plaintiffs' right to recover. The questions with reference to the value of property, which plaintiffs allege was unlawfully allotted, and as to such offsets as might be proper, in the event plaintiffs should be held entitled to recover, were reserved for future consideration, if necessary. No findings have therefore been made with respect to these questions.

*147Under the civilization act of 1889, all the bands and tribes of the Chippewa Indians in Minnesota living on twelve distinct reservations ceded to the United States,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. McElrath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Gritts v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Hegler v. FaulknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Oakes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. The Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (No. 19) Red Lake Band, (No. 189-A) and Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (No. 188) v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Red Lake Band v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  4. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  5. Minnesota Chippewa TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API