Legal Opinion

Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 20, 1986No. Nos. 19, 188 and 189-APublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

These cases involve numerous claims filed by the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe and the Red Lake Band for allegedly illegal or otherwise, improper actions by the United States in the conduct of its affairs with the plaintiff Indians over the more than a century and a half since the parties first attempted to regularize their relationship by treaties. Currently before the court are eight motions for summary judgment, four filed by plaintiffs and four by defendant. Disposition of these motions will resolve only a minor portion of the pending cases, but any progress made in…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Minnesota v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Confederated Tribes of Colville Reservation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Whitney Benefits, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  3. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  4. Red Lake Band v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API