Legal Opinion

State v. Reinke

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2013No. CC 090130185; CA A144138; SC S059760PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant has petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Reinke, 354 Or 98, 309 P3d 1059 (2013), which affirmed the Court of Appeals decision and the trial court’s judgment. As defendant correctly notes, the Court of Appeals decision affirmed the trial court’s judgment in every respect except one. The Court of Appeals “reversed and remanded [the trial court’s judgment] for resentencing” because count 15 of the indictment did not include a determinate and indeterminate term of incarceration, but “otherwise affirmed” the judgment. State v. Reinke, 245 Or App 33, 34, 260 P3d 820…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ReinkeOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. ReinkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. PipkinOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Kohring v. BallardOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. SagdalOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. SupanchickOregon Supreme Court · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API