Legal Opinion

State v. Reinke

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 2013No. CC 090130185; CA A144138; SC S059760PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Ordinarily, a trial court may impose up to a 10-year prison sentence on persons convicted of second-degree kidnapping. See ORS 161.605(2). However, if the court or a jury makes certain factual findings, the court may sentence a person convicted of second-degree kidnapping as a dangerous offender and impose a 30-year prison sentence. See ORS 161.725(l)(b) (authorizing the imposition of that sentence). The question in this case is whether the Oregon Constitution requires that the facts necessary to impose a dangerous offender sentence be found by the grand jury and pleaded in the indictment.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. PipkinOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Kohring v. BallardOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. ReinkeOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. SagdalOregon Supreme Court · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API