Legal Opinion

Avant v. Willowglen Academy

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 15, 2003No. 3676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*184CONNOR, J.:

Travelers Property Casualty Company (Travelers) filed a motion with the Workers’ Compensation Commission seeking an order identifying the proper carrier for Marty Avant’s claim. The single commissioner found United Heartland (United) was the proper carrier. The full commission reversed and found both carriers equally liable for the claim. The circuit court reversed in part and ruled Travelers was responsible for Avant’s claim. We reverse.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Travelers began insuring Willowglen Academy (Willowglen), a subsidiary of a Wisconsin corporation, on August 15, 1994,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc. v. Crane National Vendors Division of Unidynamics Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Adoptive Parents v. Biological ParentsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Baggott v. Southern Music, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Nettles v. Spartanburg School District 7Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. RomeroSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Avant v. Willowglen AcademySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Avant v. Willowglen AcademyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Avant v. Willowglen AcademySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Rodriguez v. RomeroSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API