Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Romero

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 28, 2005No. 25948PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice WALLER:

This is a workers compensation matter. At issue is which of two insurance carriers, The Insurance Corporation of New *82York (INSCORP) or Capital City Insurance Company (Capital), is responsible for coverage for injuries sustained by Celestino Rodriguez in a work-related accident on June 27, 2000. The single commissioner held Capital was the responsible insurance carrier; the full commission affirmed. The circuit court reversed and held INSCORP is the responsible carrier. We affirm the circuit court’s ruling.

FACTS

Rodriguez was employed performing construction-type labor for Hector…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Franklin Mortgage Corp. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  4. Hendricks v. Pickens CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Avant v. Willowglen AcademyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Grant v. Grant TextilesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Brown v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Bass v. Kenco GroupCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Gadson v. Mikasa Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API