Rodriguez v. Romero
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Justice WALLER:
This is a workers compensation matter. At issue is which of two insurance carriers, The Insurance Corporation of New *82York (INSCORP) or Capital City Insurance Company (Capital), is responsible for coverage for injuries sustained by Celestino Rodriguez in a work-related accident on June 27, 2000. The single commissioner held Capital was the responsible insurance carrier; the full commission affirmed. The circuit court reversed and held INSCORP is the responsible carrier. We affirm the circuit court’s ruling.
FACTS
Rodriguez was employed performing construction-type labor for Hector…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Franklin Mortgage Corp. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- Hendricks v. Pickens CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Avant v. Willowglen AcademyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
3Cited by17 opinions
- Grant v. Grant TextilesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Brown v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Bass v. Kenco GroupCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Gadson v. Mikasa Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.