Legal Opinion

Avant v. Willowglen Academy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 30, 2006No. 26102PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PLEICONES:

This is a workers’ compensation case. Respondent Travelers Property Casualty Co. (Travelers) moved the Workers’ Compensation Commission to identify Petitioner United Heartland (United) as the insurer responsible for the claim of Willowglen Academy (Willowglen). The single commissioner held United responsible. The appellate panel of the commission affirmed in part and reversed in part, holding Travelers and United equally responsible. The circuit court affirmed in part and reversed in part, holding Travelers solely responsible. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Rodriguez v. RomeroSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Mims v. AlstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. German Evangelical Lutheran Church v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Avant v. Willowglen AcademyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Avant v. Willowglen AcademySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Burris v. PROPST LUMBER & LOGGING, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Crews v. W.R. Crews, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Hembree v. One Thousand Eight Hundred Forty-Seven Dollars (1,847.00), U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  5. Jeffrey v. SUNSHINE RECYCLINGCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API