Legal Opinion
U.S. Philips Corp. And North American Philips Corp. v. Windmere Corporation, Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 27, 1989No. Appeal 87-1476PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
This case involves electric shavers. Windmere Corporation (Windmere) appeals from a final order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida directing a verdict in favor of U.S. Philips Corp. and North American Philips (collectively Philips) on Windmere’s antitrust counterclaims, 680 F.Supp. 361. Because we hold that there was sufficient evidence to submit the antitrust claims to the jury, we reverse and remand for a new trial on those claims.
*697I
A. The Proceedings in the District Court.
In October 1984, Philips filed suit in the district court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Biodex Corporation v. Loredan Biomedical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Amsted Industries Incorporated, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Buckeye Steel Castings CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U. S. Philips Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lepage's Incorporated v. 3m (Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.