Legal Opinion

Morf v. Ingels

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 5, 1936No. 759PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, District Judge.

The plaintiff seeks to enjoin state officials from enforcing a state layr which .allegedly invades his rights under the Federal Constitution. Upon issue joined, the case was tried and submitted for decision in a three-judge court.

For several years automobiles have been transported upon their own wheels from *924eastern points for sale in California. The practice increased so that automobiles, or cars, as we shall hereafter generally refer to them, were being brought into Calif ornia • singly and in fleets of from three to forty. In the fleets which were commanded by…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
  2. State v. PateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bender v. ConnorDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1939
  4. In Re Great Western Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
  5. Union Packing Co. v. RoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API