Legal Opinion
Silas Mason Co. v. Henneford
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided August 3, 1936No. E-4473PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAVAN AH, District judge.
The United States, under an act of Congress (33 U.S.C.A. § 701 et seq.), is engaged in the construction of the Grand Coulee Dam, on the Columbia river, for the purpose of controlling floods, improving navigation, providing for the storage and delivery of stored water for the reclamation of public land, and generation of electrical energy. After receiving bids for the construction of the dam, which is one of unusual magnitude, a contract was, on July 16, 1934, entered into by the United States and the plaintiffs (other than the Mason-Walsh-Atkinson-Kier Company)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Lemke v. Farmers Grain Co. of EmbdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Shafer v. Farmers Grain Co. of EmbdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. ReilySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Public Utility District No. 2 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Stewarts' Pharmacies, Ltd. v. FaseHawaii Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.