Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Nicholls v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1998No. 95-1421PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant contests the staff hearing officers’ order on reconsideration on jurisdictional and evidentiary grounds. Our review supports the issuance of the requested writ on jurisdictional grounds.

Commission Resolution No. R94-1-8 permits reconsideration of the commission’s order in three instances: (1) unusual legal, medical, or factual questions of interest to the commission; (2) new, previously undiscoverable evidence; or (3) fraud. None of these conditions exists here.

Fraud has never been alleged, leaving criteria one and two for our review. As to these latter criteria, the respondent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Weimer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. B & C MacHine Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Board of Education v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Manns v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Belle Tire Distribs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State ex rel. Gobich v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Nicholls v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Foster v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Zarbana Industries, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API