Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Hytech Tool & Die, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 1997PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in requiring plaintiff to be examined by a neuropsychologist located in Mississauga, Ontario. Defendant established that there were no suitable neuropsychologists located closer to plaintiffs residence, and the court required defendant to reimburse plaintiff for her expenses and those of a companion.

The court abused its discretion, however, in requiring plaintiff to submit to the examination outside the presence of her attorney. A…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Guardianship & Custody of Alexander L.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Jakubowski v. LengenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Lamendola v. SlocumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Ponce v. Health Insurance PlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Reardon v. Port AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lindell v. KaluginOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. OverstreetKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. A.W. v. County of OneidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Boswell v. SchultzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. Blake v. CzyszAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API