Legal Opinion
Lamendola v. Slocum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 2, 1989PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Duskas, J.), entered April 25, 1988 in St. Lawrence County, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ cross motion to compel plaintiff Gloria Lamendola to submit to a physical examination without permitting either videotaping or the presence of her attorney.
Plaintiffs commenced this action for personal injuries and loss of consortium allegedly sustained as a result of a motor vehicle accident. Pursuant to CPLR 3121, defendants served upon plaintiff Gloria Lamendola a notice to submit to a physical and neurological examination concerning the injuries…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jakubowski v. LengenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Plattsburgh Distributing Co. v. Hudson Valley Wine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Ponce v. Health Insurance PlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Maggio v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Mosel v. Brookhaven Memorial HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bermejo v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Parsons v. Hytech Tool & Die, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Flores v. VesceraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Allen v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Cooper v. McInnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.