Johnson v. Solomons
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The plaintiff in the above action sought a decree, declaring the rights of the parties under a contract for the exchange of real property. The property, conveyed to defendants Solomons, was improved by the erection thereon of two apartment houses. Said defendants filed a cross-complaint, alleging fraud by plaintiff inducing the exchange and asking for a rescission. The other parties to the action are the lessee of the two apartment houses, and certain pel-sons who placed the furnishings therein at the instance of the tenant, for which payment was not made in full. This furniture was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Murphy v. SheftelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Smith v. QuestaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Pedlar v. StroudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bakewell v. BakewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Peninsula Properties Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Bessinger v. GrotzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Western Gulf Oil Co. v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.