Legal Opinion

Bessinger v. Grotz

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1942No. Civ. 13282PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff is a judgment debtor whose real property was sold to defendant under a judgment foreclosing a mortgage. He brought this action under section 707 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as a preliminary step to a redemption, to compel an accounting and disclosure of rents and profits alleged to have been received by defendant. Judgment was given for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.

The trial court made findings which state the facts upon which plaintiff’s right to redeem depends, including plaintiff’s demand on defendant for a statement of rents and profits and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Gunder v. GunderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Middleton v. FinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Collins v. CorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hollar v. Saline Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. David v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Home Owners' Etc. Corp. v. EngelbertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Brown v. Trophy-Craft Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Bessinger v. GrotzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Brown v. Trophy-Craft Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API