Legal Opinion
LeGrande v. COM., DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 10, 2006PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
Before this Court in our original jurisdiction are the preliminary objections of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC) to a petition for review in the nature of mandamus filed by inmate Robert A. LeGrande, representing himself. LeGrande asks this Court to direct DOC to credit his new state robbery sentence for time he served in federal prison.
In his mandamus petition, LeGrande avers the following facts. In January 1994, while on both federal and state parole, LeGrande was arrested and charged with robbery. On November 14, 1995, Le-Grande entered a negotiated…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coady v. VaughnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Clair v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Doxsey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. DorianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Africa v. HornCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Unified Sportsmen v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Lawrence v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Santiago v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Sturgis v. DoeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Schuylkill Products, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.