Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Santiago v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 2007PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Pedro Louis Santiago (Santiago) petitions for review from an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) denying his request for administrative relief by refusing to give him credit toward backtime on his Pennsylvania sentence for time spent in custody in a Pennsylvania State Correctional Institution for a Maryland sentence which was to run concurrent with outstanding or un-served sentences.

Santiago was originally sentenced in Pennsylvania in 1992 to four years, nine months to 10 years for possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Nelson v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. DiPetrillo v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  5. Chalifoux v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kerak v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Baasit v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Burno v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. A. Aviles v. PBPPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. A. Tidwell v. PA BPPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API