Doxsey v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
COLINS, President Judge.
Before this Court in our original jurisdiction is a preliminary objection filed by the respondent, Department of Corrections, to a petition for review, as amended, filed by pro se petitioner, Arthur Doxsey.
Petitioner alleges that respondent has not properly calculated his “minimum sentencing date.” Respondent has attached to its preliminary objection copies of the official criminal court records, which contain the relevant dates for purposes of determining petitioner’s sentencing date and ascertaining whether he was incorrectly deprived of pre-sentence credit. We grant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Francis v. CorletoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Stone & Edwards Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Department of InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Stone & Edwards Insurance Agency, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Doria v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Bailey v. BD. OF PROBATION & PAROLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- McCray v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Lawrence v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Sweatt v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Fajohn v. Com., Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.