State v. Coristine
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 This case asks us to determine whether the trial court violated petitioner Brandon Coristine’s constitutional rights by offering an affirmative defense instruction over his objection. Coristine argues that offering the instruction to the jury violated his right to control his defense. We hold that where a defendant chooses not to argue or invoke an affirmative defense, offering an instruction on the defense over the defendant’s objection violates the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We reverse the Court of Appeals and remand for a new trial.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State v. BarryWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. LynchWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- People v. Jo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- State v. StearmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.