Legal Opinion

People v. Jo

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided October 3, 2017No. C079280PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRenner, J.

*1134Following a jury trial, defendant Nan Hui Jo was convicted of child custody deprivation ( Pen. Code, § 278.5, subd. (a) ) and sentenced to 175 days in county jail and thirty-six months probation.1 On appeal, defendant contends: (1) the trial court improperly instructed the jury on the union of act and criminal intent, (2) the trial court improperly instructed the jury on section 278.7, which provides an affirmative defense to child custody deprivation, over defendant's objection, (3) the trial court failed to properly respond to the jury's questions regarding the relationship between sections…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Palmieri v. Cal. State Pers. Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. (HC) Dias v. FisherDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. Barboza v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. City of Rocklin v. Legacy Family Adventures etc.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. Palmieri v. Cal. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API